Tuesday, July 31, 2007
CLAYMORE # 1
WE JUST CAN'T HAVE THIS: So the NY Times prints (of all things) a story written by two gentlemen previously critical of all things Iraq front saying things are getting better. Amazing. How did this get past the politburo? This simply will not fly. The gyrations from the libs since are disgraceful as usual. This type of thinking does not fit the script the Dems have already written. There is no coming back from the defeatist position they've taken, so if things continue to become more secure, they have nowhere to go. They'll be seen as the party who advocated withdrawing American forces from a battle against Al Qaeda they were winning. The next step in Iraq has to be political progress, and that leadership has to come from the Iraqis themselves. Bush should continue the surge and push hard for the Iraqi legislators to work harder. May I suggest a little global public humilition?
WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THIS?: There has been some discussion starting late last week concerning one Presidential candidates exposure of a certain body part that shall remain nameless. This is gross. Talk radio discussion of this matter has already ruined several of my lunches. Please stop.
EXECUTE PEDOPHILES: Some dirtbag is getting press because he stalks young girls and posts their photos on the web, along with advice on how to remain a legal pedophile and places for others to stalk children. Dan Abrams of MSNBC should be ashamed for broadcasting an interview with the aforementioned creep. Airing that interview was no less than promoting pedophilia. Offenders convicted of sex crimes against children should receive the death penalty for the first offense. Attempting to rehab these villains is a waste of public funds. Our society needs a big dose of reality on this subject. The idea of letting people loose around our children who are so dangerous we have to maintain a list and keep the public informed is absolutely absurd. One of our innocent children is more precious than all the child molestors who have ever lived. I am sick to death of children being sexually assaulted by those previously convicted of such crimes. Under the first time death penalty, that never happens. Protecting our kids has to come before the rights of evil men.
JINGOCON
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
MACHINE GUN
PAKISTAN: Musharraf has started to martial some of his forces to battle the Taliban and Al Qaeda vermin infesting his country. There is a bloody showdown coming in the northern mountains, and you can expect a push by NATO forces from the other side (Afghanistan) when the stuff hits the fan. The hammer and anvil tactic has been tried before, but never with real Pakistani cooperation. At this point, Musharraf has a choice: either kill them or they will kill you. With nuclear weapons involved, America has to hope he wins.
TONY BLAIR: The former British Prime Minister has started his Middle East diplomacy tour. I cannot imagine why he would want to take on such a convoluted mess, but more power to him. He will find in short order that negotiating with bloodthirsty savages is impossible. The Palestinian areas are essentially under the control of Hamas and their sad little katyushas. Working out anything would be a miraculous accomplishment. Mr. Blair is a good man trying to help in a very bad region of the world. No doubt his travels will be many.
GERALDO: Why is FNC allowing that smarmy guy with the bad toupee take up more and more airtime? Oh wait, that's Geraldo. Okay, why is FNC allowing far left liberal Geraldo to take up more and more airtime? His job appears to be defending the indefensible for the loony lefties at every turn. My former unit (101ABN) kicked his behind out of Iraq for talking too much. Maybe we can arrange an air assault to swoop into the Fox studios and snatch Geraldo, then drop him over at MSNBC or CNN where he belongs.
JINGOCON
Monday, July 23, 2007
YOUTUBE AND THE DEMOCRAPS
A few of the questions submitted by YouTube users and selected in advance were actually serious inquiries concerning policy, but only a few. A member of our military stationed in Okinawa asked how Billary would deal with Muslim countries to whom womens rights are unknown. Hadn't thought of that one, but Billary was ready with her stock answer about her travels as First Lady. Not the same, Senator. No Arab will smooch your buttocks when you're the President of the United States. Surely she understands the difference between the two positions, or does she have experience at blurring that line? She even suggested it might be a poke in the eye to the Arabs. I don't see that. More like they would be ready to take advantage. Several other folks submitted questions about the Iraq front, and no news was made. The Democrap candidates are uniformly yellow.
Now to the bulk of the "debate". The Dems rally around four basic ideas:
1. We should retreat from Al Qaeda in Iraq and damn the consequences;
2. President Bush is bad and wrong and stubborn;
3. Raise federal taxes across the board; and
4. Use those taxes to fund bigger federal government.
Unfortunately for them, W. will not be running in '08. It will indeed be interesting to see what happens when the Dems lose their boogeyman/whipping boy. Governor Richardson actually used the phrase "major federal program". Now Governor, you've seen how effective the "major federal program" we call Border Patrol or ICE is at stopping illegals. Maybe the feds should get control of the programs they already have before they start more. They just never stop wanting to expand the size and scope of government at all levels. As for the taxes, people will not vote for a tax increase to expand government that cannot perform its basic duties. Even proposing retreat from the Iraq front aids enemy propaganda and fuels the terrorists. I never imagined we would witness this sort of willful retreat in the face of real evil.
Many of the questions diminished the Presidency itself or did not apply to the actual job. Questions about female registration for Selective Service, their favorite teacher, whether their children went to public or private school, and whether they had spoken to their kids about age appropriate sexual matters all have absolutely nothing to do with beig President of the United States. All wastes of time in an effort to be cute. It didn't stop there. Crazy Dennis Kucinich actually encourage the audience to text "PEACE" to members of Congress. Questions submitted by a snowman about global warming and a heavy metal rap video about No Child Left Behind did nothing to add to the prestige. Laughably, the Dem audience observing for Frank Luntz on Fox were all fired up about the format. It is notable that the idea of Congress infringing on the role of CINC is uniform throughout the left.
Hussein Obama showed the inside of his empty suit by immediately agreeing to meet with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuala, and North Korea. Billary jumped in and slammed him by saying she would only do so if proper diplomatic work were done ahead of time. Looney Mike Gravel provided the irony for the night in a campaign commercial claiming Iraq should have been a "police action based on global intelligence." Think about that.
Once again, Fred Thompson for President 2008.
JINGOCON
THE SURRENDER MONKEY SENATOR
Friday, July 20, 2007
BILLARY STRIKES BACK
She is demanding to see plans for American withdrawal from Iraq. Instead of brushing her off politely, the aide in question took a shot at her. Probably inappropriate, but true. The Senator from New York has no appreciation for the propaganda value such an admission represents. Membership on the Senate Armed Services Committee does not make you Queen of the Armed Forces. It's merely another constitutional reach by Congress into CINC territory.
Late Friday, Billary struck back. She called the remarks "offensive and inappropriate", saying the administration opposes "Congressional oversight". Nonsense. Legislators playing armchair general 8,000 miles from the battle think it's "oversight". John Kerry even joined in the howling. Of course, by that point they had to trod out the tired old "they're impugning my patriotism" horse. Sorry, Senators, not this time. The man said you're helping enemy propaganda, so yeah, I guess it is a qestion of patriotism. Do you want America to win or not? Funny, because every Democrap bray tells me you want to surrender Iraq to the minions of Al Qaeda, handing them a great victory.
A statement issued by SECDEF Gates was not encouraging. He should come right out and tell the cold, hard truth: that all the crybaby whining is not helpful to our effort. SECDEF seems to be attempting to smooth things over instead of standing ground on a morally superior position. How unusual.
JINGOCON
Thursday, July 19, 2007
PENTAGON SLAPS BILLARY
Billary has been pushing the Pentagon to develop plans for withdrawal from the Iraq front. The pushing has been so persistent and public that the Defense Department finally had to say something. It's striking that the White House hasn't taken this issue up with all the Dems. Their public condemnations of Bush and a war effort vital to our national security are just not in the national interest. Admittedly some of the blame lies with the administration for not maintaining better communications with Congress. On the other hand, those making political hay out of shortsighted opposition to fighting Al Qaeda can't expect the buddy treatment. Both sides have fell short of the cooperation necessary for a comprehensive war effort. The Pentagon says talk of planning for withdrawal from the Iraq front fuels terrorist propaganda. No, really?
Billary continues to stick by her twisted Iraq policy. She wants to get the troops out, but Al Qaeda's there, so a "residual" force will remain. This begs the question of why any American would withdraw from a scrap with terrorists, especially when the enemy has designated it a central front. Front, ladies and gentlemen, not "Iraq War" like it's not part of the wider effort. The Senator from New York is stuck between primary and general election politics, and an essentially inexplicable strategy for Iraq is the result. That's a dangerous place for America to be.
Fellow Dems daring to oppose Billary in the primary are trying out the tactic of having their spouses criticize her. Elizabeth Edwards has led the pack on this. Boy, liberals sure are comfortable hiding behind skirts. Whether it's the war or calling talk shows, Dem candidates use their wives like relief pitching. Still, no one is really throwing or landing any punches.
Notice there is no picture for this entry. Think about it.
JINGOCON
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
THE GO-TO GENERAL
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
SENATE SLUMBER PARTY
Monday, July 16, 2007
I CAN'T HEAR YOU ANYMORE
Talk show hosts are killing me. It's just not possible for a conservative to get a fair question, much less a fair shake from most debate opportunities. The suppositions contained within their smarmy little liberal talking points are consistent: invariably factually incorrect and always stated with liberal opinion on the matter weaved in as gospel truth. Chris Matthews is the master of this art. The broad spectrum of the liberal media does the very same thing, perhaps to a lesser degree, but with the same intent. The liberal in the debate can then agree with the untruth and proceed to attack. The conservative has to first refute the untruth and parry the attack before making a point of their own. Check out "Hardball" or any CNN interview and you will quickly and clearly see the pattern described above.
Democrats need to decide whether or not they will ever defend America. No military action of any kind is ever to their liking. Their specialty is backbiting the CINC and abetting the enemy through anti-American and defeatist statements. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Nevada Senator Harry Reid, who should be wearing a turban by now. It's just pathetic that a political party has chosen to put political gain above national defense interests as a matter of course.
I never dreamed the country would need motivational therapy to fight the war just six years after 9/11. Everyone involved should go back and read the speech given to Congress by President Bush on September 20, 2001. He did try to tell us about the length and difficulty of the struggle at hand. If an attack comes to our shores again, those who have bitched and moaned about every aspect of the war at home and abroad will bear a large part of the responsibility because their actions demonstrate weakness, and thus encourage terrorists. My hearing gets worse every day.
Of course, unfortunately a Democrap will be President again one day. And I will accord them all the respect for office that they have shown President Bush. Except when it comes to matters vital to our defense, and in those cases I will salute and support our armed forces AND their CINC. Can any of the Dems say that now?
Every day that passes makes Joe Lieberman look more and more like the last Dem with any sense at all remaining.
JINGOCON
Sunday, July 15, 2007
FAREWELL, LADY BIRD
Friday, July 13, 2007
535 LITTLE GENERALS
One doesn't have to be a constitutional scholar to see the issue clearly. The role of Congress is restricted to declaring war, and either raising, supporting, or providing for the armed forces. That's it. Article II, Section 2 states "The President shall be commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;...". These two roles are simply stated and brightly marked. The Founders didn't write this stuff by chance. They knew that a remote Congress cannot and should not attempt to directly command troops in the field. They wisely left the soldiering to Washington, who often chastised legislators for failing to provide for deployed forces. This arrangement worked much to their success, especially since many in the Continental Congress lacked basic knowledge of military affairs. Sound familiar?
As events progress, consider how far Congress is attempting to reach. Match that against the Constitution, and you can clearly see Congress attempting to wield executive power. Investigation and not legislation will probably rule for the remainder of the current administration. President Bush is right to stand firm when 535 little generals on Capitol Hill attempt to command forces from eight thousand miles away. Their only choice is either to fund the war or not fund the war. And since they have already demonstrated that they likely will not anytime soon acquire the political guts to terminate funding, expect the status quo.
I always feel better when Congress is out of town.
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
USS ENTERPRISE DEPLOYED TO GULF
Coverage of one particular story today should have dominated programming. It is a story that directly impacts our national defense and economy, and yet no one seemed to notice. The lack of coverage for this story forever proves the vapidity of the liberal media.
The United States Navy has announced the USS ENTERPRISE will be joining the USS STENNIS and USS NIMITZ in the Persian Gulf. The addition of a third American aircraft carrier to the region enhances an already overwhelming air superiority and gives us the ability to hit a potential opponent very hard for an extended period. Now, let's see, who in the region might be begging for an extended campaign of bombing?
The liberal media doesn't have the experience or intelligence to recognize the significance of this move or what it might mean for the future. The United States does not haphazardly move an aircraft carrier, much less move a third ship into an area already chock full of American air power, without underlying strategic aims. I believe the move is intended to rattle the saber loud enough for Iran to hear clearly, and to provide the sort of additional air power that will be needed if force be required to limit the Iranian nuclear program. Solid proof is also available incriminating Iran in the deaths American troops in Iraq.
Watch and see what happens over the next several months. President Bush may be planning a little surprise party for the mullahs in Iran. The provocative actions of the Iranians have been tantamount to war, so it's time they got a dose of the real thing. My objection is that it has taken way too long for the CINC to address the terrorist state in Iran.
JINGOCON
Monday, July 09, 2007
COWARDICE IN THE FACE OF THE ENEMY
Friday, July 06, 2007
MACHINE GUN # 4
TAKING OUT THE TALIBAN: Over 100 nastly little insurgents were terminated in fighting in Afghanistan Friday. The Taliban and Al Qaeda are continuing their pathetic efforts to falsely accuse alllied forces of bombing civilians, and now they've even suckered the UN (no surprise) and the Associated Press into swallowing their bogus numbers. Who here with a brain really thinks coalition forces have killed more civilians than the Taliban this year? Ridiculous. The Associated Press should be at least a little ashamed. The UN has none. In any event, the terrorists in Afghanistan are taking a whoopin' no matter how the lib media spins it. I wish our forces continued success in eliminating America's enemies with all deliberate speed.
THE GUTLESS THREE: Three allegedly Republican U.S. Senators have now spoken out in favor of a "course change" in Iraq. When all the flowery language is removed, what they're talking about is surrendering by withdrawing forces from a major battle already engaged with Al Qaeda. Just like that. I have previously raked George Voinovich over the coals ("INTIMIDATING GEORGE VOINOVICH"), so now I have to add his two cowardly compatriots. All three of them should hang their heads in abject humiliation for advocating a policy of retreat in the face of the enemy. Dick Lugar, Pete Dominici, and Voinovich are examples of politicians that bend with the winds of the polls without regard to right or wrong. Their pandering is no more appealing than Billary changing accents to suit the crowd. Unfortunately, the security of our nation is involved, and these three "men" have chosen the little girl "cut and run" policy rather than stand up and fight evil. Sad.
Once again government officials elected as conservatives get to Washington and govern as liberals.
LIBERAL MEDIA WARNING: The libs are making a run at preemptively discrediting Fred Thompson, proving the strength of his upcoming candidacy. The past week has seen numerous media outlets run the same story about Fred being all style and no substance. Now they have focused on his Watergate role, including dredging up profane comments made by Nixon. None of this will work, and I predict by December, Fred Thompson will lead the field.
JINGOCON